Dr. Ken Beer's dream may look something like a cross between a Nintendo Game Boy and an Etch A Sketch, but he prefers to refer to it as "the future of medicine." Beer, an entrepreneurial dermatologist, makes software for doctors to run on tablet computers.

... Beer is seeking investors and partners to help him finish and market his first program, called Dermsoftware, which is designed for dermatologists; after that, he will expand in-to other medical specialties. At $24,000 to $32,000 per system (which covers the software license, upgrades, and a Hewlett-Packard server), Beer knows that he is asking a dear price. But he is convinced that medical practices will gladly pay it.
I too am the object of Dr. Beers wrath since when he signed up as a member of this site he tersely requested that I 'shut this site down immediately'. Heavens I'm becoming unpopular. Perhaps I'm the only one on the planet who could create an alliance between Beers and Mudd.
Dr. Beers is not only letting his obviously substantial ego run amok, he is chasing a red herring in this case.
"Anyone who is not a dermatologist, ENT, oculoplastic has no business doing any aesthetic procedures. All PCPs, PA, RN whatever should be malpracticed out."
Perhaps Dr. Beers misunderstood what the definition of dermatology actually is while he was career planning. Here's the first definition I found.
Dermatology: The branch of medicine concerned with the diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of diseases of the skin, hair, nails, oral cavity and genitals.
Dermatology wasn't designed to be 'cosmetic' medicine. It's the study of diseases of the skin. The 'cosmetic' aspects of medicine were inherited by dermatology and plastic surgery as they were the closest medical specialities.
So now you have dermatologists who identify themselves as 'Cosmetic Dermatologists' because there's an understanding that the cosmetic aspects of medicine don't fit under the disease aspects that really is dermatology.
Which brings us to the changes taking place in in medicine.
The physician of the future will be managing technology, not utilizing an individual skill set. Physicians are a hugely inefficient method of delivering treatments. They're expensive to train, they're slow, and they're expensive. Dr. Beer really is fighting city hall on this one.
What's better... technology.
Medicine is moving to technology solutions. That's what the market demands. That's what is happening and nothing that anyone says or does will change it. It's happening faster in retail medicine because it's not encumbered by the inertia of the third party payer system but it will happen in all of medicine.
A useful analogy would be the family farm. Everyone likes the romantic notion of the family farm. In fact, legislation is passed and moneys provided to keep family farms in existence. But if you think that the family farm will exist in a hundred years outside of a living museum you're mistaken. The family farm is inefficient and markets and progress demand efficiency. So the family farm will change to more efficient methodologies. Any effort to save family farms just forestalls the inevitable. It's the way of the world and nothing that you, I, my farmer friends, or Dr. Beers does will change the way that markets work.
And as new technologies are developed faster, it negates the 'training' that was needed to ensure the effective delivery of the treatments. I'll bet that there's not a dermatologist in the country who performs every bikini line hair removal treatment in their cosmetic practice. Where are these hidden hoards of board certified derms and ENT's that are ready to fill the cosmetic demand?
Dr. Beers position would not ring as hollow if he was focused on who could safely deliver services rather than the protection of a club to which he belongs. Certainly his position seems to be that any physician offering Botox who is not a boarded dermatologist is a quack.
I'd suggest that there's an argument that there is a strong ethical conflict for all dermatologists performing cosmetic treatments.
Skin cancer will soon become the most common cancer in the US. In most cases there's a two month wait to get in to see a dermatologist to take a look at a mole. It could easily be argued that any dermatologist performing cosmetic procedures is selling out needed patient care to cash in and make a buck.
I don't subscribe to this theory myself of course. It's just a thought.