Plastic Surgery Product Placement
/Be Born Again
To promote Dr. Kim's plastic surgery office, this life scale poster was placed at the entrance of his office and by the elevator in the main lobby of the hospital building.
Medical Spa MD: Physician community of skin clinics, laser centers, plastic surgeons, dermatologists and aesthetic doctors practicing nonsurgical cosmetic medicine.
To promote Dr. Kim's plastic surgery office, this life scale poster was placed at the entrance of his office and by the elevator in the main lobby of the hospital building.
Have you tried do-it yourself plastic surgery or home Botox injections?
In tough economic times, many try to cut costs, including in their beauty regimen. Despite the risks, some people have decided to skip the doctor -- and obtain and self-administer cosmetic treatments.
If you have self-injected products like Botox, Restylane, Juvederm, silicone, and other substances, 20/20 would like to hear your story.
Please fill out the form below, including information about your experience, and a producer may be in contact with you.
You can tell ABC all about it here.
Normally, I barely listen to the radio when driving in my car, but today on the John Tesh Radio Show (Sunday) my ears perked up when he started to discuss the hidden "dangers" of young girls using makeup too early. Dangers in makeup? Really?
The broadcast was entitled "The Ugly Truth About Young Girls Wearing Makeup". The line that grabbed my attention was "the sooner your daughter starts wearing makeup, the sooner it might kill her!" This was a quote coming from Stacy Malkan, a cosmetic expert who wrote the book Not Just A Pretty Face: The Ugly Side of the Beauty Industry. According to the John Tesh website, Malkan states "by the time most North American girls become teenagers, many have a daily make-up ritual that includes lipstick, mascara, eyeliner, nail polish and perfume, not to mention skin lotion, shampoo, conditioner, and hair color treatments." She goes on to say "in fact, experts estimate that a typical young girl now walks around with at least a dozen layers of beauty products on her body! As the makeup layers add up, so does her exposure to dangerous chemicals, and that’s very bad news for a young girl’s health."
Apparently the culprits are chronic exposure to parabens and phthalates which have been found to disrupt hormone levels during adolescent years which may result in early puberty. Malkin continues to state "one study found that HALF [sic] of all North American girls now begin to show signs of breast development by the age of 10 – which is more than two years sooner than females from our grandmother’s generation. Other studies link those unusual hormone levels to a higher depression rate among young girls, and a higher risk for breast cancer! That’s why experts recommend women of all ages find out exactly what chemicals go into their makeup."
There is a website suggested for reference to verify the ingredients in certain beauty products and cosmetics and it is called the Skin Deep Cosmetic Safety Database. I was instantly intrigued and raced to my Mac when I got home to give it a try! Here's how my products scored:
(Scale: 0-2=Low hazard; 3-6 Moderate Hazard; 7-10 High Hazard).
My gosh, I'm a walking carcinogen!!! Like most women, I use an array of products, from medical grade like Obagi, spa grade like SkinCeuticals, high end department stores like Merle Norman, Estee' Lauder and Laura Mercier, right down to drug store brands like Maybelline. It seems no company's products were completely safe. And, makeup is just the beginning for young girls!
More and more young girls are taking their skin care regimens to the next level by having microdermabrasion treatments and chemical peels, with some escalating to laser and injectable therapies. Putting aside the various protocols for acneic adolescents, there has actually been a rise in the U.S. of young girls undergoing laser hair removal, photo facials, dermal filler procedures, even laser lipolysis. Where do we draw the line as clinicians? 21? 18? 16 with parental consent? I know in our medical spa we have been approached by parents inquiring as to what our policy is for treating adolescents for non-medical related conditions. The number one request is laser hair removal for ethic skin types predominately for excess facial hair. Many clinicians feel it is a low-risk procedure which can lift a child's self-esteem. Some clinicians disagree and feel a child is much too young to be exposed to laser therapies.
I'm not a laser expert and am uncertain as to if many aesthetic equipment manufacturers have performed clinical trials on adolescents for laser procedures (other than port wine stains). I'm more apt to believe the answer to this questions will become clearer as the years go on and by remembering the first rule is to "do no harm".
That, and to throw away your teenager's makeup!
Author: Paula D. Young RN runs internal operations and training at Young Medical Spa and is the author of the Medical Spa Aesthetics Course, Study Guide, and Advanced IPL & Laser Training course for medical estheticians and laser technicians.
Submit a guest post and be heard.

The're are a growing number of 'home laser hair removal' devices appearing on the market. This article on do it yourself laser hair removal supposes that medical spas and laser clinics are feeling the heat.
Want to get rid of some unsightly hair, but don’t want to spend the big bucks for electrolysis or a laser clinic? Now, you can buy your own laser and do it yourself.
And people are.
The growth of the at-home cosmetic-device market, which includes personal lasers, has some professionals buzzing. At an annual conference hosted by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons, Barry DiBernardo, a New Jersey surgeon, delivered a talk in Seattle about the pros and cons of the DIY market on the ASPS’s “Hot Topics” panel.
“We have to make sure that the patients are getting good, safe treatments. If they are getting good, safe treatments, then whether they are doing it at home or not, I’m not as worried,” DiBernardo told Wired.com by phone. “What I’m worried about is that they are seeing things in the Skymall on the airplane and spending hundreds of dollars, thousands of dollars on something that is not going to work or is unproven.”
New cosmetic medical devices including DIY lasers are expected to explode into a $1.3 billion market 2013, up from just $296 million in 2008, according to the analyst group Medical Insights. The growth in the market appears to be coming from light-based products that claim to either remove or grow hair on the human body. The Silk’n Hair was the first at-home laser device to be approved by the FDA, in 2006, although it didn’t come on the market until early 2008.
The laser hair removers damage the hair follicles that are in their growth phase, generally leading to some permanent reductions of body hair. DiBernardo questioned whether the lasers used in the home devices were powerful enough to get the kind of results that clinics achieve.
“In general, these devices are low-powered versions of the doctor versions. We’ve been doing hair removal since 1998, so we know that they work and how well they do,” he said. “I think these home devices have some effect, but they legally can’t have the power of what we fire at people.”
From nother nice post from Wired:
My own experience is that people looking to do it yourself home laser hair removal (or skin tightening or complexion light-based photo-therapies) are really looking to save money and are buying a device in the hope that it will work. Patients who are actually interested in laser hair removal or skin tightening are put off by these types of home remedies. I've never heard that a laser clinc or medical spa is suffering from this, but I may be wrong.
Does anyone running a medical spa or laser hair removal clinc feel differently? Is laser hair removal at a medspa moving to home laser hair remvoal that a do it yourself laser treatment?
I must say I am a little disappointed in my former company of employment, but on November 3rd Johnson & Johnson, Inc. announced that they will no longer be manufacturing or marketing Evolencedermal filler in the United States just a year after they received their FDA approval.
Ortho Dermatologics porcine derived collagen filler was gaining in popularity with many clinicians across the U.S. praising the product for its ease of injection and smoothness in appearance and feel. Although few in number, the main complaint of the product from a consumer standpoint was that they wished it lasted longer. However, many went on to say the look and feel of the results far outweighed its lasting effects.
Johnson & Johnson, Inc. has not stated a definite reason for why the product is being pulled from the U.S. market. A statement on their website reads:
"On November 3, 2009, we announced our intention to discontinue the manufacture and marketing of EVOLENCE®products. Patients and medical professionals who may currently be using EVOLENCE® products can be assured that they remain effective for the approved indications with a favorable safety profile. EVOLENCE® products will continue to be supported for medical inquiries and adverse event reporting, in accordance with regulatory requirements."
Author: Paula D. Young RN runs internal operations and training at Young Medical Spa and is the author of the Medical Spa Aesthetics Course, Study Guide, and Advanced IPL & Laser Training course for medical estheticians and laser technicians.
Submit a guest post and be heard.
I've seen and head about medical estheticians, medical assistants and even front desk staff administering Botox injections.
It's not legal, as this story on the prosicution of a medical assistant clearly shows.
Betty Guerra’s monthslong nightmare is over.
The 45-year-old former medical assistant learned today from her attorney that the 10 felony counts against her on allegations of “unlawful practice of medicine” will be dismissed, she said.
“I always believed things would work out the right way,” she said tearfully. “I cannot be punished for something I didn’t do.”
Guerra’s July arrest sparked controversy over what medical assistants can and cannot do. Specifically, there was confusion over whether they are able to give shots.
Guerra was accused of unlawfully administering cosmetic injections, an act commonly performed by medical assistants throughout Nevada.
The state attorney general’s office did not specifically say charges against Guerra would be dropped but indicated it won’t be pursuing the case.
“The complaint against Betty Guerra submitted to the Attorney General’s Office by the Board of Medical Examiners has been contradicted by the subsequent actions by the Board,” Attorney General Catherine Cortez Masto said in a statement. “Therefore, it is fair for us to conclude that it would be difficult to prosecute this case beyond a reasonable doubt.”
Guerra’s attorney, Jason Weiner, said this evening that the attorney general’s office had sent him a copy of an unfiled motion dismissing the case earlier in the day. He would not be able to provide the Review-Journal with a copy of that motion until Wednesday, he said.
After Guerra’s arrest, physicians became concerned about what duties their medical assistants could perform.
Former medical board director Louis Ling said that upon reading a 30-year-old law, he concluded that the assistants could not give shots. With flu season coming on, he then attempted to draft emergency regulations that would allow them to give flu shots, but not Botox or other cosmetic injections.
However, that effort was shot down when a judge recently ruled that the board, in considering the regulations, had violated the open meeting law.
The board later reversed its position, determining that state law allows medical assistants to administer everything from flu shots to Botox. Medical assistants could give shots as long as they are under the “direct supervision” of a physician. Most health officials and doctors take that to mean the physician is on premises.
Ling resigned on Friday.
Guerra, a mother of three who was a physician in her native Peru, said she has been under incredible stress since her arrest and lost her job because of the publicity surrounding her case.
“It was a nightmare. I could not even sleep or eat all this time, wondering what was going to happen.”
Still, she said she harbors no anger.
“Now, I start all over. But it’s just another experience in my life.”
Via Review Journal story.

Via an almost unbeliveable story on Wired:
A website that sells a prescription drug similar to Botox without requiring a prescription claims it has more than 2,000 customers. Some have learned how to inject the botulism-derived drug into their own faces from YouTube videos produced for the site.
Discountmedspa sells a variety of other DIY cosmetic treatments, including prescription Renova, and lip-filling gels. The botulinum toxin-derivative for sale on the site is Dysport, produced by the pharmaceutical company Ipsen and is a competitor of Allergan’s Botox. The site simply calls it “the Freeze.”
A Grand Prairie, Texas, woman, Laurie D’Alleva, who appears to be the site’s proprietor, performs treatments on herself in self-made videos posted to the site’s YouTube channel. In one video, D’Alleva pulls out a vial of what is presumably Dysport and a syringe filled with saline.
“It’s important to remember that you are mixing the potency of the botox,” she says, mixing the contents of the vial with the saline solution. She then injects her forehead and the areas around her eyes.
Ipsen received FDA clearance to sell Dysport in the United States a few months ago, but it’s a prescription medication. It’s the first direct competitor for the branded Botox, which is the most popular cosmetic treatment in America. Doctors did more than 2.4 million Botox procedures in 2008, according to the American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. In recent years, the vast amounts of money spent on the treatment have attracted scams and knockoffs, which the FDA has had to crack down on. In May, the FDA also ruled the drug needed a tougher “black-box” warning label to reflect an increased understanding of the small, but real risks of the treatment.
In the U.S., it is illegal for anyone but a doctor or nurse practitioner to prescribe drugs to patients and only pharmacists can dispense drugs to people.
Video: The original YouTube video was pulled by DiscountMedSpa on Wednesday, October 28. Wired.com had saved the source and has embedded that video in the story.
In a blog post response to a customer’s skeptical query, Laurie provided the following explanation for the legality of her site and the provenance of her products.
I know there is much information out on the net about fillers and Botox ‘knock-offs’. This is not what I am selling! The products I have are from a company names Ipsen… I have a connection that allows me to get products that are not usually available in the states because I purchase other products in their line. Now the trick is I have to market it and label it under my own brand, to keep them and myself from getting into any legal trouble. It does take a leap of faith, but I assure you I have over 2000 customers now who love the products and are saving literally hundreds of thousands of dollars between us!
“I watched a Doctor on YouTube.com do this to a patient and he warned people not to inject below the eyes however I had to put a smile on my face too,” Lesley commented on a blog post. “The trick to this is to hold a pencil just at the corner of one side of your mouth and inject two units of Freeze at the very bottom of your chin. This will cause your [sic] very end of your mouth to turn up. Then do the other side the same way. If you don’t get it even you may have a crooked smile so be very careful that the injection is placed in exactly the same place as the other side.”
Her recommendation for another user is to “watch YouTube.com and you will learn a lot of some of the Doctors [sic] secrets to recreating your face the way you want to look.”
Other women describe mishaps with over-injecting the drug.
“My Dr. would never inject the crows feet. I did and got GREAT results!” wrote a commenter named Pat. “Unfortunately, I can’t read those little hash marks on the syringe too well and over injected above the brow on one side. A week later I’m now sporting a half closed and swollen eye, and look ready for Halloween!”
the Texas Department of State Health Services released the following statement, but would not comment further.
“The Texas Department of State Health Services is aware of discountmedspa.com through a complaint we received. That complaint status remains open and under review,” the agency wrote.
The complaint was made under the Texas Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, which regulates the sale of prescription drugs like Dysport in the state.
“Botox is a prescription drug that must be dispensed or sold by a licensee pharmacy and only with a prescription from a licensed practitioner. Any over-the-counter sale of Botox is illegal,” the agency affirmed.
Unbelieveable that people could be so dumb as to inject themselves with Botox... or anything else for that matter. Discount Medspa's owner is definately headed for the slammer.
I just received this email from someone reporting to represent Discount Medspa:
Name: Laurie Sanders
Email Address: sheryar10@hotmail.com
Comments: Hi. I am the owner of the video clip for Discount Medspa that you posted. You do not have permission to use this clip and it is our intellectual property. I hired the model in the video to do the ad, and you have now used her name in the article incorrectly and said she is 'going to jail'. I am requesting that you remove the video and the article as many of your 'facts' are wrong and can be considered slander. We are located in Ontario and do not wish to share any other information with your site.
Of course they're referring to the Wired Magazine article that originally published this story and is quoted above. The video that Laurie is referring to that shows a woman performing do it yourself Botox injections is also from Wired.
You have to love people throwing that 'Slander' term around anytime they don't like what you're saying.
Who’s your nipple role model?
Have no idea what I'm talking about? (Nipple surgery to change the shape, color or size of your areolae.)
According to the Daily Mail, a cosmetic surgery clinic called the Harley Medical Group in London has reported a 30 percent rise on nipple surgeries in the past year, including more from women who haven’t recently undergone mastectomies.
With a price tag of roughly $3,200: ‘padding’ the areola with extra skin as to push the nipple out, ‘popping out’ inverted nipples, and even getting tattoos to change the areolae’s pigmentation.
One doctor from the clinic thinks celeb nipple slips are the cause. “Until now celebrities didn’t expose their nipples so they were no ‘nipple role models,’” explained Dr. Riccardo Frati, a plastic surgeon with the Harley Medical Group.
I came across this article from Australia on Botox and Restylane being injected in womens feet.
IT'S the subject of whispered conversations over cocktails deep within Flemington's Birdcage. The secret weapon a flock of fashionistas rely upon to teeter upon 10cm stilettos all day long at the races.
Botox and filler injections for the feet are the latest crazes in cosmetic surgery to make their way to Flemington - and the solution, according those with cash to splash, to the old racing conundrum of how to wear those towering pumps and not end up carrying them home after the final race has been run.
For about $1500, some doctors, such as Bondi-based cosmetic surgeon Michael Zacharia, will inject hyaluronic acid (Restylane) into the balls of the feet.
The fluid, commonly injected into joints to treat osteoarthritis, numbs the parts of the foot that become strained by wearing sky-high heels.
And judging by the height of the footwear that was racing out the door of Melbourne boutique Miss Louise yesterday, 10cm heels will indeed be spotted around the Birdcage today.
Dr Zacharia, who has been doing the procedure for just over a year, said the foot filling provided "internal padding for the feel at that point of pressure underneath the balls of the feet. Instead of using those silicon pads inside your shoes, this is an internal way of doing it."
The procedure, however, is a lot more expensive than purchasing a pair of silicon inner-soles. At $750 per foot, the fillers will last for about six months.
Dr Zacharia said three or four people this week had told him they wanted the foot fillers for the Spring Racing Carnival, but he warned those considering the treatment that the sensation immediately following the injections could be uncomfortable.
"I've been told that for about 10 minutes afterwards it feels like you are walking with marbles in your feet, or it's like there is something in your shoe," he said.
The other procedure women are turning to is "bootox" - having Botox injected into the balls, arches and soles of the feet to paralyse the sweat glands, which Dr Zacharia said would also set you back about $1500.
Australasian College of Podiatric Surgeons president Mark Gilheany said while women might think the procedures were magic solutions to stiletto-fatigue, foot fillers could be masking symptoms of more serious problems.
He warned that for people experiencing a significant amount of pain standing in heels it could be a sign of partially dislocated bones or torn ligaments.
"If you require something of that (surgical) nature then you could have an underlying problem," he said.
"It's not something that is routinely done and I haven't seen any clinical trials to say whether the injection of a biological cushion into the foot is effective.
"If there was anything that really worked I'm sure I would know about it. It seems like a waste of time when you can stick a cushion in your shoes and take some paracetamol."
When the first laser lipolysis device was approved by the FDA it started a whole new revolution in the medical spa industry.
Many physicians who invested in the technology believe it saved their practices from succumbing to the downfall of the economy. Soon after the approval, an array of new lipolysis technologies began to develop over time. Wavelengths were altered to find the optimal "melting point", ultrasound technology was applied, high-powered water jets were developed - all in the name of technological advancement. At that time I wondered, "What the industry could possibly develop to top this?".
It wasn't long until I received my answer! Enter, the Natural Breast Augmentation procedure utilizing fat transfer under local anesthesia! Hard to believe this procedure wasn't perfected sooner! Take the fat from one body area and put it in another - perfect! Up until this point, there was a lot of controversy regarding fat transfer. In fact, for 20 years it was denounced by U.S. plastic surgery societies as being a "dangerous" procedure. Unfortunately, this declaration was based on the technology and techniques utilized over 20 years ago. Heck, even our laptops are obsolete after 3 years!
Dr. Todd K. Malan of the Innovative Cosmetic Surgery Center in Scottsdale, AZ developed new techniques which resulted in the lifting of this "ban" in March of 2009. Many dispute the success rate for the survival of the fat after the transfer. However, with the latest technological advancements in fat harvesting, adipocyte survival rates have proven to be 85% to 90%. With the addition of adult stem cells to enhance the fat transfer and breast splinting technology, adipocyte survival rates have shown to be even higher. In fact, Dr. Malan states that when the fat transfer is concentrated with adult stem cells harvested from the patient's own fat, and is injected into the fat that is already within the breast, the result can equal a permanent increase of 250cc to 500cc in overall breast size equating to a 1 to 2 cup size increase.
Of course there are many facets to this procedure not covered in this post. I just applaud innovative technology when I see it for my own eyes. So much so, that Young medical spa (our medspa) is now performing this procedure after being trained by Dr. Malan himself and others like Dr. Jeffrey Caruth of Plano Aesthetics in Plano, TX. Technology is wonderful, isn't it?
I wonder what the industry could possibly develop to top this?
Author: Paula D. Young RN runs internal operations and training at Young Medical Spa and is the author of the Medical Spa Aesthetics Course, Study Guide, and Advanced IPL & Laser Training course for medical estheticians and laser technicians.
Submit a guest post and be heard.
Is your medical spa using a new vial of Botox for every patient?If your medical spa is using a new vial of Botox for every patient, yours will be the first medical spa or cosmetic practice of any kind that I've ever know to do so.
Here's a story from the Las Vegas Review Journal that specifically points out Botox as a 'contributor' to an outbreak of hepatitis C. Of course, if you read the story you'll see that some nurses were observerd 'reusing needles' that contaminated vials of Botox. A very different cause indeed from just using the Botox on multiple patients.
And of course, there's the cost, which almost every medical spa meantioned in the story. (You'd have to get all of your Botox from Canada to afford that.)
Here's the story.
Single-use Botox vials used on more than one patient.
That practice at the Endoscopy Center of Southern Nevada, public health officials have repeatedly said, contributed to the hepatitis C outbreak in the Las Vegas Valley.
A phone call to inquire about the cost of a Botox party was greeted with this information: "It will be cheaper if all the partiers use the same vial."
One business that seems to be going well in Las Vegas is known for throwing Botox parties. That's an ongoing phenomenon across the country where friends get together and drink champagne while their wrinkles are needled away.
"We just couldn't handle it financially," said one medical assistant who asked to remain anonymous. "We would have gone out of business."
Medical assistants at two different spas said their owners only stopped multipatient use of single-use vials of Botox "until things quieted down" after the hepatitis outbreak was announced.
The Review-Journal had little trouble finding medical providers who said they and their companies knowingly broke state and federal regulations.
"You can't have doctors worrying about breaking the law or guidelines or whatever," Niamtu said.
A new company called Dysport is manufacturing a similar product, and the competition could force Allergan to provide smaller dosage vials to physicians who want them, he said.
Now a federal lawsuit filed in California by Las Vegas physician Ivan Goldsmith argues that sales representatives for Allergan Inc., maker of the popular anti-wrinkle drug Botox, promote multipatient use of its 50-unit or 100-unit single-use vials.
Goldsmith's lawsuit alleges that doctors can only make a profit using Botox if they reuse the single-use vials that the drug comes in.
But the complaint also raises issues that go beyond dollars and cents, ones that the community has been acutely aware of since the hepatitis C outbreak became public in February of last year.
The Botox business model "created an unacceptable and unreasonable risk of serious and debilitating injuries and illnesses, including HIV and Hepatitis B and C," states the lawsuit, filed Sept. 29 in U.S. District Court for the Central District of California.
Allergan spokeswoman Kellie Reagan said the product's (Botox) prescribing label has always been clear: single use only.
She wouldn't comment, however, on how Allergan's sales representatives promote the drug's use.
Goldsmith said in the lawsuit that Allergan misrepresented to him "the true and permissible use of the product."
Most patients need far less Botox than is provided by Allergan in either its 50-unit or 100-unit vials, the lawsuit said.
And, according to the suit, the medication can't be saved for later use on the same patient because, once a vial is opened, it must be thrown away within four hours of first use.
Physicians and medical spa providers of Botox contacted by the Review-Journal said Allergan's sales representatives have consistently said vials of Botox could be used for multiple patients.
"No matter what training seminar or continuing medical education course I went to, the Allergan people always said a vial was for multiuse," said Sandra Bledsoe, who operates Focus Medical Weight Loss & Spa. "Many patients only need 15 or 20 units at a time."
"Allergan seminars have demonstrated multiple patient use of the product for years," said Las Vegas plastic surgeon Dr. Julio Garcia, who said he has attended the company's seminars.
Garcia said doctors felt they could be safe if they used a new syringe and needle for each injection, which, even if against the rules, would result in sterile treatments.
The problem comes when mistakes happen, said Dr. Joseph Niamtu, a Richmond, Va.-based cosmetic facial surgeon long active with the American Academy of Cosmetic Surgeons and the Cosmetic Surgery Foundation.
"Someone inadvertently picks up a contaminated syringe and inoculates the entire vial," he said.
That may sound familiar.
Last year, health officials revealed that authorities investigating a cluster of hepatitis C cases had observed nurses at the Endoscopy Center's Shadow Lane clinic reusing syringes in a manner that contaminated single-use vials of medication.
Nine hepatitis cases were linked to the practice, and more than 50,000 people were urged to get tested for blood-borne diseases.
Medical officials say no cases of hepatitis C have been connected to Botox injections.
Still, Dr. Ihsan Azzam, state epidemiologist for the Nevada State Health Division, said concerns about blood-borne diseases in relation to the administration of Botox can't be dismissed.
He said discussions with some of the state's medical providers have made it clear to him that multipatient use of single-use Botox vials continues in Nevada.
The Review-Journal also contacted providers who say the practice is ongoing.
"I think we need to include use of Botox as a risk factor when we talk about hepatitis," Azzam said.
He noted that after he sent a bulletin to physicians and other medical providers about injection safety in the wake of the hepatitis C crisis in Las Vegas, some providers who administered Botox in their practices were not supportive.
In his directive, which echoes the position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, he wrote: "Do not administer medications from single-dose vials to multiple patients or combine leftover contents for later use."
He said a number of providers called him to say that they wouldn't follow the regulations because they knew how to safely administer Botox to multiple patients from a single-dose vial.
"I was very surprised," Azzam said Thursday, adding he hopes state inspectors will catch those who refuse to abide by medical regulations. "Some seemed to be daring me to come after them."
If caught, physicians' licenses would be at risk.
Azzam said Botox providers told him it would not be possible to make a profit if the injection practices he supported were followed.
"I followed the rules," Goldsmith said last week. "And it killed me financially."
Goldsmith is asking the court that his lawsuit be certified as a class action, arguing that more than 100 doctors who invested in the product are affected nationwide, with their economic losses exceeding more than $5 million.
In his lawsuit, Goldsmith said a 100-unit vial of Botox could cost him $1,000, but a patient treatment might only be $500. Because it is a single-use drug, the rest would then have to be thrown away.
"You were losing money that way, not making it," Goldsmith said. "The patient didn't want to eat the cost."
Goldsmith has had a run-in with the Nevada State Board of Medical Examiners, which last year subpoenaed some of his patient records.
The board said it had received information that Goldsmith illegally dispensed compounded medications, dispensed medications without having a pharmacist on site, allowed clerks to dispense medications, and used human growth hormone on patients without meeting Food and Drug Administration criteria.
Goldsmith has denied the allegations and, more than a year after the board's subpoena, no action has been taken.
Garcia said he is following the rules regarding Botox injections, but knows that many in the medical community aren't doing so.
Last year he wrote a letter to the state medical board saying patient safety could be compromised because spa personnel continue to inject Botox "with the doctor not present."
That issue has been in the news lately, the result of recent attempts by the medical board to keep medical assistants from injecting Botox. That effort failed.
"The possibilities of infection, given what is going on when it comes to injecting Botox by whomever, are terrifying," Garcia said.
"We're not talking about 40,000 or 50,000 people. We're talking about hundreds of thousands of injections" in Southern Nevada.
Tracy Jones, a Las Vegas saleswoman, said while she has been a frequent user of Botox, she generally doesn't know if she is the only one receiving Botox from a vial.
"It's not something people ask," she said.
Most medical providers are well aware that Botox, like any injectable medication, can be contaminated when drawn up into a syringe.
To prevent contamination in his Botox injections, Niamtu, the Virginia facial surgeon, said he and his staff every day will draw up five sterile 20-unit syringes of Botox from a 100-unit vial.
Though he said that may not be in accordance with CDC guidelines that say single-use vials cannot be used for more than one patient, Niamtu said he must walk a tightrope between the "practical and the optimal."
He said "something will have to be done," if medical officials in other states become as aggressive in enforcing regulations as he believes they are in Nevada.
"Doctors can't throw away that much medication, and patients aren't going to pay for the extra," Niamtu said. "Allergan will have to step up to the plate and make different quantities of the drug. It may cost them a little more."
Note: The identities that were in this post have been changed but the events are all as described.
The negative comments are directed at one of the management team. I became aware of this medical spas concerns a few days ago after I received a string of emails from the medspa chain's 'CS Manager'. (Im guessing that CS is short for customer service.)
I can certainly understand why this medical spa is unhappy. Evidently the individual named in the comments was previously part of a failed franchise called Skin Nuvo and was one of three Skin Suvo operating officers who was sued by the SEC for 'Swindling investors of $11 million'. However, charges against the individual in question were dropped.
Here's an excerpt on the Skin Nuvo suit from the San Francisco Chronicle article:
Three men, including a Concord resident, were sued by the Securities and Exchange Commission on Wednesday on charges that they swindled more than $11 million from investors in a skin-care business that later filed for bankruptcy.
..."Skin Nuvo was projecting a glamorous image with their stores in very flashy and high-end malls, but beneath the surface, the company was in deep financial trouble," said Michael Dicke, an SEC supervising attorney.
Skin Nuvo, based in Henderson, has since filed for bankruptcy. During the alleged fraud from 2002 to 2004, the company's Bay Area stores -- which sold skin care and hair removal products -- were located in shopping malls in San Francisco, San Jose, Richmond, Concord, Corte Madera and Walnut Creek.
The SEC suit seeks to bar the men against any future violations of securities laws, a civil monetary penalty and the recovery of any ill-gotten gains.
So here's some of the emails that I received, and my response, over the course of the next three or four days. They start with an email from S.H. the CS (Customer Service?) Manager.
First email: S.H. of Nu U
Subject: Slanderous blog agiainst N.V./___ Medspa
Message: I need to speak with someone ASAP re: several slanderous remarks that have been made on your forum against N.V., owner of _____ Medspa.
Please contact me at 702-xxx-xxxx to discuss.
Thank you,
S.H.
CS Manager
My same-day response to S.H.:
Hello S,
What can I do for you?
S.H. want's to talk immediately. He's entirely too irate to just communicate that a comment may have gone over the line and violated Medical Spa MD's own terms. No, S.H. want's to talk. Now. Here's the next two emails:
Is it possible to call you? Too much to put in an email.
S.H.
Jeff – there is a blog on your website re: N.V., owner of _____ Medspa. The blog is dated 3/4/09 and is authored by “_____ Isn’t For You”.
The blog states Mr. V. only hires attractive females and then tries to date them / makes sexual advances towards them. It goes on from there.
This is slanderous and libelous and a complete and total lie! I am formally requesting this particular blog entry be removed immediately. If you are unwilling to remove said blog then I will forward onto my legal department for further handling. Please reply at your earliest convenience.
Thank you for your attention to this urgent matter.
S.H
CS Manager
_____ Medspa
I got another email amost immediately. Evidently my inability to grasp just how urgent this issue is and my lack of action in removing an anonymous post is getting under S.H's' skin. He dicides to forgo any more niceities and threaten me with his 'legal department'. Ouch. Here's S.H's next email.
This is slanderous and libelous and a complete and total lie! I am formally requesting this particular blog entry be removed immediately. If you are unwilling to remove said blog then I will forward onto my legal department for further handling. Please reply at your earliest convenience.
Have to give it to S, he's a silver-tongued devil. I mean, having an entire 'legal department' set on my like wild dogs? Terrifying.
So now I'm dealing with the 'legal department'. Here's what they sent.
Our firm, Kamensky Rubinstein Hochman & Delott, LLP, represents ___ medical spas.
Our client has informed us of various outrageous and defamatory blog postings/comments made on your website http://www.medicalspamd.com/ that impugn the character of Mr. N.V. of ___, specifically postings from "___ Isn't For You!" dated 3/4/09 and 4/10/09 and "former skin medique employee" dated 3/25/09.
In the March 4, 2009 posting, "__ _ Isn't For You!" falsely states that Mr. V only hires attractive females and then tries to date them or makes sexual advances towards them. In addition, "__ _ Isn't For You!" falsely states that if such sexual advances are not accepted, the employee does not get paid. In addition, in "__ _ Isn't For You"'s April 10, 2009 posting it falsely accuses __ _ of "multiple violations of state and federal labor laws, multiple instances of unwanted sexual advances and harassment." Similarly, "former skin medique employee" falsely states that Mr. V is "crooked," a "con artist," and "shady" and further falsely states that "if N.V. is involved . . . It is a scam from the word go."
This is not the type of content expected from a thoughtful website regarding medspas. Accordingly, we request that you immediately remove the postings posted by "__ _ Isn't For You!" dated 3/4/09 and 4/10/09 and "former skin medique employee" dated 3/25/09. We also request that you provide us with the names and all information in your possession relating to "__ _ Isn't For You" and "former skin medique employee."
Now isn't that nice? Within something like 72 hours we've progressed from a simple email request to this Medical Spas' demand that I turn over information on individuals who've made negative comments about them. This medical spa went from trying to get a single comment removed, to making the front page of Medical Spa MD. (Medical spas usually have to pay for that privledge.)
Of course this may not be the kind of publicity that __ _, S.H, and N.V wanted. I can't think that this medspa would really want the fact that one of their corporate officers was once sued by the SEC. But with the nasty-grams that S and his legal department are sending me it made me wonder what all the hubbub's about.
Let me take a moment here and discuss what I think S could have done that would have better fit his medical spas business needs.
First: Don't take it personally. Every medical spa is going to have unhappy patients and ex-employees. You can't shut them up. Don't try. Perhaps they're unhappy for a reason. Your best bet is to engage in civil conversation. If you're making decisions on behalf of your medical spa or laser clinic, you need to keep your emotions out of the way. You're going to have dissagreements and sometimes they'll get personal. Don't let it affect your 'actions'. Medical Spa MD doesn't have any interest in harming this medical spa and no Medspa MD author wrote those comments.
But I wasn't responding fast enought to S and he took that as a slight. It wasn't. I don't know S and my first response, 'how can I help you', was an invitation for him to lay out his case. He didn't take advantage of that. Instead he lost focus on what he was trying to accomplish.
Second: Focus on your goal. Sean's goal was simply to get me to remove a comment. It's not unreasonable. I've done it before. I've removed any number of comments that attacked individuals in a way that had nothing to do with their business and was just an attempt to hurt them personally. I don't like those attacks and when I find them, I often remove them and at times, block an IP address so they can't make more.
S lost sight of the goal which was to get a comment removed. Instead, he switched his goal to getting to me. If he'd not been so agressive he'd probably have gotten the offending comment edited or removed. Instead, S pulled a gun by threatening me with his 'legal department'.
Third: Never pull a gun unless you intend to use it. S went nuclear when he had his 'legal department' fire off a demand. If S was smarter, he would have done his homework and seen that Medical Spa MD has been threatened many times by medical spa francises and their lawyers and knows well how to handel cyber-slap lawsuits. Read this Medical Spa MD post on cyberslap lawsuits, legal rights and anonymous comments on the web.
S went 'legal team' way, way too fast. I wasn't being unreasonable. I didn't tell him to 'go to hell'. It just wasn't at the top of my list of things to do. Medial Spa MD can get twenty or thirty contacts a day. I could care less that S demands to talk to me on the phone right away. Get in line. A single anonymous comment doesn't rise to the need of emergency care. S would have done much better with a simple, "I know you're busy" and a written explianation of his need to get a medspa comment removed.
__ _ Medspas legal team doesn't have a leg to stand on demanding information about people who comment on Medical Spa MD either. Anyone has a perfectly legal right to post anonymously on the web. Comments on Medical Spa MD are most commonly anonymous for exactly that reason. Physicians don't want to be held liable for the advice they give to other doctors, and laser technicians working at some laser clinic franchise don't want to lose their job.
Last: Never pull a gun on the person holding the mic. If you don't know what that means... From the begnning, S is making demands and acting pretty agressive, but he's only got one weak pair of twos (his 'legal team') and he plays them right away. Now he's got nothing left. If he's emailing some ex-employee that kind of intimidation might work, but not in this case.
By threatening Medical Spa MD and myself directly he's chosen to make an adversarial relationship when he needed a helpful one. While I don't have any axe to grind against S or __ _ Medical Spas, I don't really appreciate this kind of interaction. Any new threatening communications S or his 'legal department' they'll be posted right here on Medical Spa MD's front page where our 50,000 monthly visitors can decide for themseleves. (I can't think that any named Medspa's physicians will welcome questions about it.)
For my part I'll put a quick notice up on the Medical Spa comments and take a look at them sometime in the next few days. If there's something that violates our terms, I'll edit or delete it.
I can't think that S has solved his Medical Spas business needs though.
There are a lot of charitable organizations that routinely ask our medical spa for support whether it's a listing in their event program, a donation of a gift card or gift basket, or all out sponsorship of a fund raising event.
If you have a charitable heart, it's hard to choose which causes you can afford to support and which ones you cannot. Like all businesses in today's economy, medical spas have their challenges right now in keeping their businesses in the black. While making the commitment to keeping your employees and bills paid, I'm sure most of you feel an obligation to have a commitment to your community. So, instead of offering large donations to a cause, what are some other ways you can show your support for your community?
Go for a Walk! October is Breast Cancer Awareness Month and while we may not be making a large charitable donation, my entire staff bonded together yesterday to walk in a 5K Breast Cancer Awareness Walk. Wearing matching outfits and showing the sponsorship of our medical spa, my staff has made me so proud that they have given up their Saturday to walk in the freezing rain for a wonderful cause! I'm so very proud of you girls!
Put it in a Bag! At the beginning of the year I placed a large order for some pretty awesome gym rated duffle bags with lots of pockets and compartments and, of course, our logo embroidered on both sides. When someone calls for a quick donation, it's easy to fill one of these bags with some tissue paper, a Gift Card, our Menu of Services, brochures, and some little samples provided by our reps like cleansers and moisturizers.
Strategic Gifts! A campaign we really liked this year was SpaFinder's Melanoma Bracelet during the month of May for Melanoma Awareness month. In addition to our eNewsletter and Blog to educate our clients on the early detection of melanomas, we purchased these "REFLECT" bracelets from SpaFinder in bulk and handed them out to every skin consultation we performed in our office during the month of May. This special bracelet changes color when exposed to harmful UV rays.
See RED! Have your staff members wear the color red on the American Heart Association's National Wear Red Day during the month of February! We even handed out red foiled chocolate hearts to our clients and offered a special discount coupon to any client who came into our office wearing red that day! This all was advertised ahead of time on our website and eNewsletter.
While these are just a few ways you can show your willingness to get involved, I'm sure you get the idea of how easy it is to not spend a fortune and still make a difference! I encourage you to post any promotions/ideas you have to help others in our industry help show they are a part of their communities!
Author: Paula D. Young RN runs internal operations and training at Young Medical Spa and is the author of the Medical Spa Aesthetics & Advanced IPL & Laser Training course for medical estheticians and laser technicians.
Submit a guest post and be heard.
The true work horse of a medical spa, this Palomar Starlux was purchased in 2006 for $150,000. This gives you the opportunity to save more than 70%!
This IPL Starlux Includes:
Palomar Starlux 300 Series II IPL
Palomar IPL stand
Power supply
IPL / Laser Glasses
Chlller Fluid
Original paperwork, instructions and DVDs
4 HandPieces (Each of these retails for $7,000 - $10,000)
RED LuxR pulse count: 91,682
PURPLE LuxV pulse count: 2,593
GREEN LuxG pulse count 58,726
YELLOW LuxY pulse count 39,444
FREE Shipping: Up to $300
Seriously interested? Contact Medical Spa MD. Have questions or comments on Palomar IPL technolgies? Post a comment.
Note: This offer was extended to Medical Spa MD Members 24 hours before this post. If you would like to receive special offers before everyone else has access to them, join Medical Spa MD here.
Want to offer your used cosmetic lasers and IPLs to Medical Spa MD Members? Create an account and offer your used IPL or cosmetic laser in the classified listings. (Individuals only. No businesses.) If you're a reputable business and woud like to offer your IPLs or Lasers to all of our Members at once, become a Medical Spa MD Select Partner.
Federal officials in Washington State indicted three beauty salon proprieters this week for administering phony Botox and for trying to bribe an officer to overlook an unauthorized laser device.

In the first instance, Xin “Faith” He of Natural Beauty in Bellvue, WA told clients she was injecting Botox and the hyaluronic acid dermal filler Restylane when in fact she was injecting counterfeit substances. Her actions led to at least two reported negative reactions since 2004 that required a dermatologist’s or plastic surgeon’s care. One victim (pictured above), who wished to remain anonymous, remarked, “My face looked like Frankenstein’s.”
In the second case, the two owners of Crystal Nails in Burien are charged with offering an official an $800 bribe to overlook a dangerous and unapproved radiation-emitting laser treatment they had imported.
We'll, I've got skin cancer again. Not Melanomia fortunately but some other little nasties are replicating uncontroledly. One on my forhead above my brow and on on my shoulder. A little MOHS surgery should get the rascals under control. My back is starting to look like I'm a accident prone suicide bomber.
I can't say that I was overly impressed with the exam I got from my dermatologist. While I'd arranged an appointment for a spot on my back, I was never even given a once-over or asked if I had any other irregularities. It was only on a follow-up visit that I pointed out what I thought was an actinic keratosis. But no, my luck in skin cancers is not that good.
Note to self. Point out everything and ask a lot of questions.
Physicians, plastic surgeons, and dermatologists practicing nonsurgical cosmetic medicine in medical spas, laser clinics and aesthetic practices.
A community of dermatologists, plastic surgeons, laser clinics, & skin clinics world wide.
Medical Spa MD is a community of physicians and clinicians practicing nonsurgical cosmetic medicine in laser clinics, medspas, dermatologist and plastic surgeon clinics worldwide.
Please read our Terms of Service, Advertising Terms and Privacy Policy.
Copyright © 2011. All rights reserved.